Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
PDF

Keywords

Stigma
Stereotypes
Discrimination
Prejudices
Systematic Review
Behavioral Economics

How to Cite

Vecchio Camargo, C. M., Rodríguez Acosta, S. M., & Aristizabal Diaz-Granados, E. T. (2022). Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019). International Journal of Psychological Research, 15(1), 98–125. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5434

Abstract

There are minority and stigmatized groups who face particular challenges to their full participation in society. This study’s objective was to conduct a systematic review to determine theoretical and methodological underpinnings in behavioral economics that explain how stigmatization emerges within the relationship processes and social structures of individuals. Data from 1940 to 2019 were sourced from 12 relevant electronic databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. Following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, 26 studies out of 3459 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies applied experimental economics and were published between 2002 and 2018. Overall, the articles focus their research on the experiences of discrimination based on stereotypes and test their hypotheses through economic games. The data synthesis seems to reveal weak conceptual clarity, circular reasoning, and a hint of the problem of infinite regress. Thus, these issues open new and exciting avenues for future research to explore via an array of experimental applications.

https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5434
PDF

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.

*Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance, and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.01.007

Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715–753.

*Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29 (1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.008

Armstrong, J. S., & Shapiro, A. C. (1974). Analyzing quantitative models: Help for the user of quantitative models —A simple framework for evaluating their effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 38 (2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297403800212

Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Aschenfelter & A. Rees (Eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets (pp. 3–33). Princeton University Press.

Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press.

Becker, H. (1966). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press & Collier Macmillan Limited.

*Ben-Ner, A., McCall, B. P., Stephane, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Identity and in-group/outgroup differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72 (1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.007

*Bjorvatn, K., & Tungodden, B. (2015). Disabled by stereotype? Experimental evidence from Uganda. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.027

*Bohnet, I., van Geen, A., & Bazerman, M. (2016). When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Science, 62 (5), 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2186

Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.

Camerer, C. F., & G., L. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. In C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). Princeton University Press.

Cameron, R. (2018). Infinite regress arguments. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/infinite-regress/

*Candelo, N., Croson, R. T. A., & Li, S. X. (2017). Identity and social exclusion: An experiment with Hispanic immigrants in the US. Experimental Economics, 20 (2), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-016-9492-1

*Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2013). The Politics of interpersonal trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach. Political Behavior, 35 (1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9181-x

Cartwright, E. (2018). Behavioral economics. Routledge.

Chapman, K., & Pike, L. (2013). Literature of behavioral economics, part 1: Introduction and books. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 32 (4), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2013.837799

*Chen, Y., Li, S. X., Liu, T. X., & Shih, M. (2014). Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 84, 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.002

Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis (2nd ed.) Russell Sage Foundation.

Copi, I., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2014). Introduction to logic (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Curtin, R. (2017). George Katona: A founder of behavioral economics. In R. Frantz, S.-H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom & S. Mousavi (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics (pp. 18–35). Routledge.

Daniel Kahneman-Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/facts/

Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and metaanalysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, 511. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511

De Donato, X. (2011). Regreso al infinito. In L. Vega & P. Olmos, Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica (pp. 520–521). Editorial Trotta.

De Swart, H. (2018). Philosophical and mathematical logic. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03255-5

Dhami, S. (2016). The foundations of behavioral economic analysis. Oxford University Press. Durkheim, E. (1895–1982). The rules of sociological methods (W. D. Halls, Trans.). In S. Lukes (Ed.), The rules of sociological methods and selected texts on sociology and its method (pp. 30–163). The Macmillan Press.

Finfgeld-Connet, D. (2018). A guide to qualitative metasynthesis.

Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 6 (3), 347–69.

Frost, D. M. (2011). Social stigma and its consequences for the socially stigmatized. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5 (11), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00394.x

*Furuya, K. (2002). A socio-economic model of stigma and related social problems. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48 (3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00231-1

Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., Chen, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2016). Social psychology (4th ed.) W.W. Norton & Co.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.

Gratton, C. (2010). Infinite regress arguments. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3341-3

*Grimm, V., Utikal, V., & Valmasoni, L. (2017). In-group favoritism and discrimination among multiple outgroups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 143, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.015

*Grosskopf, B., & Pearce, G. (2017). Discrimination in a deprived neighbourhood: An artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 141, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.016

*Güth, W., Ploner, M., & Regner, T. (2009). Determinants of in-group bias: Is group affiliation mediated by guilt-aversion? Journal of Economic

Psychology, 30 (5), 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.07.001

*Halevy, N., Weisel, O., & Bornstein, G. (2012). ‘‘ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in repeated interaction between groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25 (2), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.726

Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4

*Heinrich, T. (2013). Endogenous negative stereotypes: A similarity-based approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 92, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.016

Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109

Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., & Sterne, J. A. C. (Eds.). (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In J.P.T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_assessing_risk_of_bias_in_included_studies.htm

Hughes, W., & Lavery, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An introduction to the basic skills (5th ed.) Broadview Press.

*Jenkins, A. C., Karashchuk, P., Zhu, L., & Hsu, M. (2018). Predicting human behavior toward members of different social groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (39), 9696–9701. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719452115

Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE Publications.

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93 (5), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392

Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. (2014). Social psychology (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Koschorke, M., Padmavati, R., Kumar, S., Cohen, A., Weiss, H. A., Chatterjee, S., Pereira, J., Naik, S., John, S., Dabholkar, H., Balaji, M., Chavan, A., Varghese, M., & Thara, R. (2014). Experiences of stigma and discrimination of people with schizophrenia in India. Social Sciences & Medicine, 123, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.035

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J. Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., P. A. loannidis, J., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. [The PRISMA Group]. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health-care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Link, B., & Phelan, J. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363

Loewenstein, G. F. (1999). Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. Economic Journal, 109 (453), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00400

Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105 (3), 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.499

Mason, T., Carlisle, C., Watkins, C., & Whitehead, E. (Eds.). (2001). Stigma and social exclusion in health-care. Routledge – Taylor; Francis.

McFadden, D. (2009). The human side of mechanism design: A tribute to Leo Hurwicz and Jean-Jacques Laffont. Review of Economic Design, 13 (1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0075-x

McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & C., L. (2016). PRESS – Peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline explanation and elaboration (PRESS E&E). CADTH. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/CP0015_PRESS_Update_Report_2016.pdf

*Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2017). Imagined contact encourages prosocial behavior towards outgroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20 (4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612225

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339 (b2435). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

Moher, D., Shamseer L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. [The PRISMA-P Group]. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA–P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

*Ouazad, A., & Page, L. (2013). Students’ perceptions of teacher biases: Experimental economics in schools. Journal of Public Economics, 105, 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.05.002

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Blackwell Publishing.

Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review, 62 (4), 659–661. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1806107.pdf

*Pondorfer, A., Barsbai, T., & Schmidt, U. (2017). Gender differences in stereotypes of risk preferences: Experimental evidence from a matrilineal and a patrilineal society. Management Science, 63 (10), 3268–3284. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2505

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Brittens, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Economic and Social Research Council [ESRC] Methods Programme. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf

QSR International Pty Ltda. (2018). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 12) [Computer software]. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home

Qualtrics. (n.d.). Qualtrics survey software [online software]. https://www.qualtrics.com

Richard H. Thaler – Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2017/thaler/facts/

Rodríguez, M., Andreouli, E., & Howarth, C. (2015). From ex-combatants to citizens: connecting everyday citizenship and social reintegration in Colombia. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3 (2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.388

*Saccardo, S. (2015). Essays in Behavioral Economics and Ethics (Publication No. 3740931) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database.

Saini, M., & Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.

*Schwartzstein, J. (2014). Selective attention and learning. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12 (6), 1423–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12104

Sent, E. .-M. (2017). Herbert Simon’s behavioral economics. In R. Frantz, S. -H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom & S. Mousavi (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics (pp. 55–65). Routledge.

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart L. A. [The PRISMA-P Group]. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647

*Shcherbakov, A. (2016). Stigma of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Cost of a spoiled identity (Publication No. 10297491) [Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database.

Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. John Wiley; Sons.

Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In T. J. Kastelein, S. K. Kuipers, W. A. Nijenhuis, & G. R. Wagenaar (Eds.), 25 Years of Economic Theory: Retrospect and Prospect (pp. 65–86). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4367-7

Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Fogelin, R. (2015). Understanding arguments: An introduction to informal logic (9 ed.) Cengage Learning.

*Stanley, D. A., Sokol-Hessner, P., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2011). Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (19), 7710–7715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014345108

Tajfel, H. (1984). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Editorial Herder.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W.G.

Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks Cole Pub.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 21–61). Nelson-Hall.

*Tanaka, T., & Camerer, C. F. (2016). Trait perceptions influence economic outgroup bias: lab and field evidence from Vietnam. Experimental Economics, 19 (3), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9452-1

Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. American Economic Review, 106 (7), 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577

The Campbell Collaboration. (2019). Campbell systematic reviews: policies and guidelines, Campbell Policies and Guidelines Series No. 1. https://doi.org/10.4073/cpg.2016.1

The Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Review Group. (2014). Data collection form for intervention reviews: RCTs and non-RCTs (Version 3). The Cochrane Collaboration. https://dplp.cochrane.org/data-extraction-forms

The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2014). Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual: 2014 edition. The Joanna Briggs Institute. https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/JBI/docs/ReviewersManuals/ReviewersManual.pdf

Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. Continuum.

*Tsutsui, K., & Zizzo, D. J. (2014). Groupstatus, minorities, and trust. Experimental Economics, 17 (2), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9364-x

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

*van Ewijk, R. (2011). Same work, lower grade? Student ethnicity and teachers’ subjective assessments. Economics of Education Review, 30 (5), 1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.008

Veritas Health Innovation. (n.d.). Covidence systematic review software [online software]. www.covidence.org

Vernon L. Smith – Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/smith/facts/

Wilder, D., & Simon, A. F. (2001). Affect as a cause of intergroup bias. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 153–172). Blackwell Publishers.

*Zeitzoff, T. (2018). Anger, legacies of violence, and group conflict: An experiment in post-riot Acre, Israel. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35 (4), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894216647901

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.