Strategic analysis of collaboration between national and multinational companies of software in Colombia using dynamics system
PDF (Español (España))


multinationals software companies
software industry
dynamics system
Industrial and organizational psychology
technology innovation.

How to Cite

Villalba Morales, M. L., Robledo Velásquez, J., & Builes Beltrán, C. (2016). Strategic analysis of collaboration between national and multinational companies of software in Colombia using dynamics system. International Journal of Psychological Research, 9(1), 83–97.


The multinationals software companies are economic agents with the potential of affecting drastically the dynamics of development of the domestic industry in this sector. These effects depend on the type of relationship (competition or cooperation) between the companies. On the relationship of competition, the literature reveals progress in their systemic understanding. However, the analysis of collaborative behavior among national and multinational software companies and their effects on the development of the latter has advanced little, being notable in the literature the absence of simulation models to analyze the phenomenon. The purpose of this work is to make a contribution in this way, using the system dynamics as a methodological approach. The results obtained demonstrate the conditions favorable and unfavorable to the establishment of a relationship of collaboration with multinational, leading to a better understanding of the phenomenon under study and facilitating the formulation and implementation of most successful growth strategies of the industry
PDF (Español (España))


Abarca, O. (2010). Alianzas estratégicas: ¿adquisición o acceso al conocimiento? Ciencias Económicas, 28(2), 263-287.

Ansoff, H., & Stewart, J. (1997). Strategies for technology based business. Harvard Business Review, 45(6), 71–83.

Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2005). From Underdogs to Tigers: The Rise and Growth of the Software Industry in Brazil, China, India, Ireland, and Israel. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barlas, Y. (1996). Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 12(3), 183-210.

Bass, F. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 215–227.

Bastos, P., & Silveira, F. (2009). Aspectos económicos del software y consecuencias para américa latina. En P. Bastos, & F. Silveira, Desafíos y Oportunidades de la Industria del Software en América Latina.

Bitzer, J. (1997). The Computer Software Industry in East and West: Do Eastern European Countries Need a Specific Science and Technology Policy? Social Science Research Network, Paper 149 .

Blomstrom, M., & Kokko, A. (2003) “Human Capital and Inward FDI”, Discussion Paper 3762, CEPR, London, February.

Bouloiz, H., Garbolino, E., & Tkiouat, M. (2013). Modeling of an Organizational Environment by System Dynamics and Fuzzy Logic. Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 3, 96-104.

Chanda, U., & Bardhan, A. (2008). Modelling innovation and imitation sales of products with multiple technological generations. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 18(2), 173–190.

Contessi, S. (2015). Multinational firms' entry and productivity: Some aggregate implications of firm-level heterogeneity. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 61, 61–80.

D’Costa, A. P. (2002). Export Growth and Path-Dependence, The Locking-in of Innovations in the Software Industry.

DANE. (2012). Clasificación industrial internacional uniforme de todas las actividades. Revisión 4 adaptada para Colombia CIIU Rev. 4 A.C. Recuperado el 22 de Junio de 2012, de

Das, S., Sen, P. K., & Sengupta, S. (1998). Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 27-41.

Daveri, F., Manasse, P. and Serra, D. (2002), “The Twin Effects of Globalization”, Centro Studi Luca D’Agliano Development Studies Working Papers, N. 171, November.

Economides. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 675–699.

Elf, M., Poutilova, M., & Ohrn, K. (2007). A dynamic conceptual model of care planning. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 21(4), 530-538.

Fadil, A. (2015). Value Co-Creation Process in Small and Medium Enterprise by Utilization of Viral Marketing as a Branding Tool: A System Dynamic Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 258 – 265.

FEDESOFT. (2011). Informe de cifras del sector del software y servicios relacionados 2005-2010.

Giarratana, M., Pagano, A., & Torrisi, A. (2004). The role of multinational firms in the evolution of the software industry in India, Ireland and Israel. DRUID Summer Conference. Elsinore.

Görg, H. & Strobl, E. (2002). Multinational companies and indigenous development: An empirical analysis. European Economic Review (46), 1305–1322.

Grant, R. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, Spring, 114-135.

Grobler, A. (2010). An exploratory system dynamics model of strategic capabilities in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21 (6), 651-669.

Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23, 737–747.

Hernández, I., & Castañeda, J. (2010). Caracterización de la industria Antioqueña del software. En J. Robledo (Ed.), Gestión de las capacidades de innovación tecnológica para la competitividad de las empresas antioqueñas de software (págs. 23-72). Medellín, Colombia: Todográficas Ltda.

Hirsch, G. B., Levine, R., & Miller, R. L. (2007). Using system dynamics modeling to understand the impact of social change initiatives. American Journal of community psychology, 39(3-4), 239-253.

Hobday, M. (1995). Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Katz, J.M. (1987), Technology Creation in Latin American Manufacturing Industries, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

Lall, S. (1992). Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, 20 (2), 165-186.

Londoño, L. (2005). Recomendaciones para la Formación de una Empresa de Desarrollo de Software Competitiva en un País como Colombia. Av. SistInf., 2(1), 41- 52.

López, A., & Ramos, D. (2009). Argentina: Nuevas estrategias empresariales en un modelo más abierto. En P. Bastos, & F. Silveira, Desafíos y Oportunidades de la Industria del Software en Amérca Latina.

Maier, F. (1998). New product diffusion models in innovation management a system dynamics perspective. System Dynamics Review, 14, 285- 308.

McKinsey. (2008). Desarrollando el sector de TI como uno de Clase Mundial. Bogotá.

Merchán, L., & Urrea, A. (2007). Caracterización de las Empresas pertenecientes a la Industria Emergente de Software del Sur Occidente Colombiano Caso Red de Parques PARQUESOFT. Revista Avances en Sistemas e Informática, 4(2), 107-116.

Milling, P., & Maier, F. (1996). Invention, Innovation and Imitation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Norton, J. A., & Bass, F. M. (1987). A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generation of high-technology products. Management Science, 33(9), 1069−1086.

O´Dwyer, M., & O´Flynn, E. (2005). MNC–SME strategic alliances — A model framing knowledge value as the primary predictor of governance modal choice. Journal of International Management, 11, 397– 416.

Orejuela, J. J. (2009). Incertidumbre laboral, Mercado y trayectorias laborales de profesionales de empresas multinacionales. Cali: Universidad de San Buenaventura.

Raffa M. and G. Zollo, 1998, Economia del Software, Napoli: ESI

Robledo, J., & Pérez, J. (2011). Modelo conceptual y aplicativo informático para la evaluación de capacidades de innovación tecnológica en PYMES del sector eléctrico colombiano. XIV Seminario Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica - ALTEC 2011. Lima, Perú.

Rodríguez, K. (2009). Colombia: Desafíos de una Industria en Formación. En P. Bastos, & F. Silveira, Desafíos y Oportunidades de la Industria del Software en América Latina.

Sampedro, J., & Vera Cruz, A. (2003). Learning and accumulation of technological capabilities in exportation maquiladora industry: case Thompson-Multimedia from Mexico. Espacios. Recuperado el 25 de Abril de 2014, de Revista Espacios:

Smeets, R., & De Vaal, A. (2016). Intellectual Property Rights and the productivity effects of MNE affiliates on host-country firms. International Business Review, 25, 419–434.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw- Hill/Irwin.

Tan, C., Yang, X., &Xu, H. (2010). An investigation of the word-processing software market war in South Korea: A game-theoretic approach. Information & Management, 47, 96–101.

Villalba, M., & Robledo, J. (2011). Multinacionales y Capacidades de Innovación Tecnológica en la Industria de Software: Un Análisis Sistémico. XIV Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica - ALTEC 2011. Lima, Perú.

Wang, C., Lu, I., & Chen, C. (2009). Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation, 28, 349-363.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.

Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991- 995.

Yam, R., Guan, J., Pun, K., & Tang, E. (2004). An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33, 1123–1140.

The work that is sent to this journal must be original, not published or sent to be published elsewhere; and if it is accepted for publication, authors will agree to transfer copyright to International Journal of Psychological Research. 

To give up copyright, the authors allow that, International Journal of Psychological Research, distribute the work more broadly, check for the reuse by others and take care of the necessary procedures for the registration and administration of copyright; at the same time, our editorial board represents the interests of the author and allows authors to re-use his work in various forms. In response to the above, authors transfer copyright to the journal, International Journal of Psychological Research. This transfer does not imply other rights which are not those of authorship (for example those that concern about patents). Likewise, preserves the authors rights to use the work integral or partially in lectures, books and courses, as well as make copies for educational purposes. Finally, the authors may use freely the tables and figures in its future work, wherever make explicit reference to the previous publication in International Journal of Psychological Research. The assignment of copyright includes both virtual rights and forms of the article to allow the editorial to disseminate the work in the manner which it deems appropriate. 

The editorial board reserves the right of amendments deemed necessary in the application of the rules of publication.


Download data is not yet available.