Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Klappenbach, H. (2021). Los aportes de la socio-bibliometría a la historia de las disciplinas científicas. Revista Guillermo De Ockham, 15(2), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.3497 (Original work published December 23, 2017)
License terms

The Revista Guillermo de Ockham provides an immediate and open access to its content, based on the principle of offering the public a free access to investigations to provide a global interchange of knowledge.
Unless otherwise established, the contents of this journal has a license with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
  • No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Abstract

   

 

 

References

Carpintero, H. & Peiró, J. M. (1981). Aplicaciones de la metodología bibliométrica a los estudios de historia de la psicología. En H. Carpintero & J. M. Peiró (Eds.), Psicología contemporánea. Teoría y métodos cuantitativos para el estudio de su literatura científica (pp. 41-52). Valencia: Alfaplus.

Casadevall, A., Bertuzzi. S., Buchmeier, M. J., Davis, R. J., Drake, H., Fang, F. C., Gilbert, J., Goldman, B. M., Imperiale, M. J., Matsumura, P., McAdam, A. J., Pasetti, M. F., Sandri-Goldin, R. M., Silhavy, T., Rice, L., Young, J. H., Shenk, T. (2016). ASM journals eliminate impact factor information from journal websites. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 29, i-ii.

David, P. A. (2005). From keeping “Nature’s Secrets to the Institutionalization of Open Science. In R. A. Ghosh (Ed.), CODE: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy (pp. 85-108). Cambridge:, MA: MIT Press.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln I. S. (2005b). Paradigms and perspectives in contention. In N. K. Denzin & I. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 183-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dilthey, W. (1989). Introduction to the Human Sciences. In R. A. Makkreel & F. Rodi (Eds.), Wilhelm Dilthey. Selected Works, volume I (pp. 47-455). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Trabajo original publicado en 1883).

Evans, J. A. (2010). Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 757-791.

Garfield, E. (2006a). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 1123–1127 (Trabajo original publicado en 1955).

Garfield, E. (2006b). The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295 (1), 90-93.

Klappenbach, H. & Arrigoni, F. (2011). Revista Argentina de Psicología. 1969-2002. Estudio bibliométrico. Revista Argentina de Psicología, 50, 44-94.

López-Piñero, J. M. & Terrada, M. L. (1993). Veinte años de investigación bibliométrica en el Instituto de Estudios Dcumentales e Hstóricos sobre la Cencia. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia - CSIC: Instituto de Estudios Documentales e Históricos sobre la Ciencia.

Snow, C. P. (1998). The two cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1959).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by